The year 2024 saw two significant procurement scandals that exposed critical failures in probity and governance within Australian government agencies: Tourism Australia and the Australian Passport Office. Both incidents revealed troubling lapses in transparency, ethical conduct, and adherence to the Commonwealth Procurement Rules (CPRs), raising serious concerns about how public funds are managed and the adequacy of current oversight frameworks.
Tourism Australia's Procurement Scandal
The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) conducted a detailed audit of Tourism Australia’s procurement activities, uncovering severe breaches of probity and accountability. Alarmingly, approximately 75% of the agency’s budget was channelled to third-party contractors without engaging in competitive tendering processes. Such practices directly contravene the CPRs, which are designed to ensure that government procurement is conducted in an open, fair, and transparent manner.
The CPRs emphasise competitive procurement as a cornerstone for achieving value for money and fostering public trust. By bypassing open tender processes, Tourism Australia not only undermined these principles but also exposed itself to risks of inefficient spending, supplier favouritism, and potential conflicts of interest. This case serves as a stark reminder that the absence of competitive processes compromises the integrity of procurement outcomes and weakens public confidence in government operations.
Australian Passport Office Procurement Failures
The ANAO also scrutinised the Australian Passport Office, revealing widespread and systemic procurement failures that spanned over four years, from July 2019 to December 2023. Among the findings were repeated instances of non-compliance with the CPRs, the non-competitive pre-selection of suppliers, and glaring ethical lapses.
One of the most concerning revelations was the presence of undeclared conflicts of interest, where personal relationships or external affiliations may have influenced procurement decisions. Such behaviour not only breaches the fundamental principles of public-sector ethics but also raises questions about how effectively these risks were managed—or whether they were even identified.
Additionally, improper procurement practices were highlighted, including inadequate documentation, failure to justify decisions, and instances where probity considerations were overlooked entirely. These systemic issues point to deeper cultural and governance failings, where adherence to probity and transparency appears to have been deprioritised in favour of expediency or other interests.
Lessons Learned and a Call to Action
The failures in probity and transparency in these two high-profile cases have reinforced the urgent need for systemic reform across public-sector procurement processes. To prevent such scandals from recurring, several critical actions must be taken:
The Path Forward
Restoring public trust in government agencies requires a steadfast commitment to addressing these failings. The 2024 ANAO findings underscore the importance of probity as the foundation of effective governance and responsible management of public resources. By prioritising reforms in oversight, training, and accountability, Australian government agencies can reinforce their commitment to ethical conduct and rebuild confidence in their stewardship of public funds.
These cases serve as a powerful reminder that probity and transparency are not optional but essential to safeguarding the integrity of public institutions. The lessons from Tourism Australia and the Australian Passport Office must catalyse meaningful change—both to prevent future scandals and to ensure that public resources are managed with the utmost care, diligence, and respect.
Our Clients
